Today you should be finishing your essays. Once you finish them, and I check them off, you need to put them on note cards and begin to practice reading them.
ORAL RUBRIC
|
Criteria |
Exceeds Standard (4) |
Meets Standard (3) |
Needs Improvement (2) |
|
Volume: How well you can be heard |
Voice is loud and clear without the student yelling. All words are heard. Student projects words from their diaphragm. |
Voice is loud throughout most of presentation. One or more words might be lost because of projection of volume, but the idea is still clear. |
Voice fades in places so that the listener loses or misses parts of the presentation, or parts of the idea |
|
Pronunciation: How well you say all your words |
Words are pronounced perfectly and sentences flow off of tongue |
The speaker trips in one or two places either in the pronunciation of a word or in reading a sentence. The presentation is effected only slightly by the mistakes. |
The speaker trips in quite a few places. The presentation is effected more than slightly by the mistakes. Mistakes either make the presentation hard to listen to or cloud the ideas of the writing |
|
Tone: Do you vary how you say your sentences |
Speaker as Actor: The speaker’s delivery makes the writing come alive by giving it emotion, character, emphasis, by breathing life into it |
Speaker varies most of sentences to express emotion or to emphasis importance of parts, but there are still places when the speaker spoke in a lifeless monotone |
Speaker speaks in a monotone that reveals no emotion or does not emphasis any importance on any idea |
|
UHMS or AHS |
NONE |
1 or 2 but the uhms or ahs do not distract the presentation |
3 or more uhms or ahs |
|
Eye Contact: do you look at your audience |
The speaker made a point to look at everyone in the room and rarely looked as if they were reading from a paper |
Some eye contact is made, but mostly the presenter read off of his or her paper |
Little or no eye contact. |
Expository Essay Rubric
|
|
Thesis |
Organization |
Evidence (Concrete Details) |
Analysis (Commentary) |
Style/Audience |
Conventions |
|
4 |
The thesis statement is clear, well-developed and relevant to the topic. It is engaging. |
Transitions within and between paragraphs flow smoothly |
There are three well chosen, concrete details/evidence from the text in each paragraph. ** The concrete details support the thesis |
All commentary synthesizes and supports the thesis statement. ** |
The style is engaging and effective |
The essay contains few if any errors in the conventions* of the English language |
|
3 |
The thesis statement is clear and relevant to the topic |
There structure within paragraphs is easy to follow |
There are two to three details from the text. The details support the thesis. |
Some or most of the commentary explains concrete details and supports the thesis |
The style is appropriate for an academic paper |
The essay contains some errors in the conventions of the English language. Errors do not interfere with the reader’s understanding of the essay. |
|
2 |
The thesis is not relevant to topic or is not clear |
The essay is missing an introduction, body or concluding paragraph |
There are some concrete details. |
Commentary is either unclear or irrelevant and does not support the thesis |
They style is sometimes appropriate for an academic paper. |
The essay contains several errors in the conventions of the English language. |
|
1 |
No Thesis |
Little organization. |
No concrete details |
No commentary |
Style is not appropriate for an academic paper. |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment